• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305-23
Device Problems Material Erosion (1214); Material Perforation (2205); Biocompatibility (2886); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Aortic Insufficiency (1715); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); No Information (3190)
Event Date 08/28/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that an unknown duration post implant of this bioprosthetic valve, the valve was explanted.The reason for explant was not reported.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that an unknown duration post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, the valve was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic bioprosthetic valve.The reason for replacement was reported as insufficiency resulting from a hole in a leaflet.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected description of event.The product has been returned to medtronic and the analysis is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the analysis.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately 12 years post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, the valve was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic bioprosthetic valve.The reason for replacement was reported as insufficiency resulting from a hole in a leaflet.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, the valve was distorted (oval shaped).The valve exhibited stent cloth damage that was consistent with damage that likely occurred during explant.All leaflets were in the closed position with the leaflets¿ free margins and lunula deteriorated due to calcification.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible except where the calcification extended on the inflow and outflow.The right cusp (rc) exhibited tissue deterioration from the lunula to the free margin.Missing tissue was observed on the belly of the rc.Extrinsic calcification was observed on the belly extending towards the lunula and free margin (inflow and outflow).There was thinning tissue noted on the left cusp (lc) adjacent to the margin of attachment (inflow view).The cusp was torn from the lunula to the margin of attachment.Tissue deterioration, possibly derived from the non-coronary right commissure, was observed on the non-coronary cusp (nc) through the free margin to the lunula.The observations on the rc, lc and nc were likely associated with calcification.Tissue deterioration due to calcification was observed on the non-coronary right and left right commissures.Extrinsic calcification nodules were observed on those commissures.Calcification nodules were observed on the superior coaptive area of the non-coronary left commissure.From the inflow aspect, thin layers of remnant pannus were observed along the sewing ring.Remnants of pannus were observed on the sewing right adjacent to the non-coronary cusp and non-coronary left stent post.Overall, an unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed during the explant procedure.Radiologic examination revealed calcification along the right cusp (rc), the left right commissure as well as on the non-coronary right commissure.Minimal calcification was revealed on the left cusp (lc) lunula and non-coronary left commissure.Conclusion: reduced performance of the valve is attributed to host tissue overgrowth (pannus) and calcification.These findings are generally considered patient-related conditions.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key7895920
MDR Text Key120960269
Report Number2025587-2018-02476
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/20/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2010
Device Model Number305-23
Device Catalogue Number305-23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/24/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/28/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight76
-
-