• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Device Problems Material Erosion (1214); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Hematoma (1884); Incontinence (1928); Unspecified Infection (1930); Urinary Retention (2119); Not Applicable (3189)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products used in this procedure? citation: int urol nephrol (2015) 47:609¿615; doi 10.1007/s11255-015-0930-3.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: "secondary surgery after vaginal prolapse repair with mesh is more common for stress incontinence and voiding dysfunction than for mesh problems or prolapse recurrence." author(s): jamie m.Bartley, larry t.Sirls, kim a.Killinger, judith a.Boura.Citation: int urol nephrol (2015) 47:609¿615; doi 10.1007/s11255-015-0930-3.The study aimed to report reoperation rates using the iuga/ics definitions and secondarily, to explore whether clinical or demographic risk factors were associated with the need for secondary surgery in women that had transvaginal prolapse repair with mesh.Between 2005 and 2011, 335 female patients (mean age was 67 ± 10 years [range 35¿89 years]) underwent vaginal prolapse repair with mesh using prolift (n=265) and elevate (n=70) of which 194 had an anterior repair, 48 had a posterior repair and 93 had anterior and posterior repair (total repair).There were two bladder injuries with the prolift trocar, both repaired and mesh was placed.Complications included recurrent prolapse at different site which required primary prolapse surgery (n=4), recurrent prolapse at same site which required repeat surgery (n=3), mesh exposure which required surgery (n=17), urethral prolapse which required surgery (n=1), groin sinus tract which required excision (n=1), granulation tissue which required cautery (n=2), urinary retention which required cutting of distal anterior compartment mesh (n=1), infected pelvic hematoma which required drainage (n=1), persistent stress urinary incontinence (n=20) treated with repeat sling (n=9) and urethra bulking agent (n=11), and urinary retention or obstructive voiding symptoms which required loosening of the string (n =21).Additional treatment of sling procedure and injection were administered on patients who did not have sui procedure at the time of prolapse.All of our patients that had recurrence were in the prolift group.Increased rates of sui retreatment, whether de novo or persistent, may be due to placement of the distal mesh anchors that limit bladder neck and urethral mobility.This may further alter the normal urethrovesical angle that contributes to the continence mechanism and may limit the dynamic kinking mechanism of action of the mid-urethral sling.Most reoperations were for sling management and sui; few were for mesh complications or prolapse recurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7903932
MDR Text Key121566534
Report Number2210968-2018-75966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K013718
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/24/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-