• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 08/30/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A ge healthcare service representative performed a checkout of the equipment and confirmed the reported complaint.The vaporizer was replaced.No report of patient involvement.
 
Event Description
The hospital reported that, during preoperative testing, output of the vaporizer was higher than expected.There was no report of patient involvement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TEC 6 PLUS
Type of Device
VAPORIZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda dr,
madison, WI 53718
Manufacturer Contact
john szalinski
3000 n grandview blvd.
waukesha, WI 
MDR Report Key7906764
MDR Text Key121711376
Report Number2112667-2018-01885
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K000275
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/25/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-