Complaint conclusion: as reported, the 6f-7f mynxgrip vascular closure device (vcd) failed to achieve hemostasis.There was no reported patient injury.No additional information is available.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were made without success.A non-sterile mynxgrip vascular closure device 6f/7f involved in the reported complaint was returned for investigation.Visual inspection of the received device showed that the shuttle cartridge was disengaged from the black handle.A tear was found on the balloon.The sealant remained inside the shuttle cartridge.The condition of the returned device indicates a balloon loss of pressure which resulted in the sealant not being deployed.Visual inspection at high magnification confirmed a radial tear in the balloon, approximately 4 mm from the balloon proximal neck.The distal segment of the balloon did not separate from the device and remained attached to the catheter.A device history record (dhr) review of lot f1733101 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿failure to achieve hemostasis was not confirmed through analysis of the returned device since the sealant was still inside the shuttle cartridge.The condition of the returned device did not match the description provided.However, a tear was found on the balloon, which indicates that a balloon loss of pressure occurred during use.The exact cause of the tear could not be determined during analysis.Based on the limited information available for review and the product analysis, access site vessel characteristics (although not reported) or sheath tip condition factors (although not returned) may have contributed to the tear found since a calcified vessel and/or a frayed sheath tip may cause damage to the balloon.This type of tear is typically observed when the balloon comes into contact with calcification and/or other procedural devices (such as a damaged procedural sheath, stent or vascular graft), potentially contributing to a tear in the balloon.It is possible that this balloon tear led the customer to remove the device from the patient without deployment, and therefore reported it as failing to achieve hemostasis.According to the instructions for use, which is not intended as a mitigation, users are instructed to discard the device if the balloon does not maintain pressure.Neither the dhr review nor the product analysis suggests that the reported failure could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|