(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The clip was not implanted and the cds was removed.Two clips were implanted, and the mr remained at 3-4.No additional intervention was performed and the patient will be monitored.No additional information was provided.Evaluation summary: the device was returned and investigated.The reported inability to open the clip was not confirmed; however, an unstable release crimper was noted.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation determined the reported inability to open the clip appears to be related to user technique due to the user not retracting the lock lever sufficiently.The identified loose release crimper was due to multiple manipulations of the device during the procedure and post-procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Cds 80529u285 is filed under mfr#: 2024168-2018-06412.
|
This event is filed for loose release crimper.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 3-4.The first clip delivery system (cds 80511u289) was advanced to the left atrium, but the clip would not open.Troubleshooting maneuvers were performed, but were unsuccessful.The cds was removed with the clip.Outside the patient anatomy, an attempt was made to open the clip again, and the clip opened successfully.It was thought that possibly the lock lever had not been pulled back sufficiently when in the anatomy.A new cds was then advanced to the mitral valve and this was the first clip implanted.The next cds (80529u285) was advanced.Visualization was difficult due to the previously implanted clip.The deployment sequence was started; however, when the actuator knob was pulled, the clip detached from the posterior leaflet and remained attached to the anterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda), and it appeared that the clip had opened approximately 60-70 degrees.An additional cds was advanced to stabilize the slda clip; however, during positioning, it appeared that the slda clip was moved on the anterior leaflet.The physician felt uncomfortable deploying the last clip for fear of causing the slda clip to fully detach from the other leaflet.Returned device analysis noted that the release crimper was returned loose from the crimping cam.No additional information was provided.
|