We have received the explanted graft for evaluation and we have confirmed the reported incident.About 2 cm at one end of the graft was found to have dilated to about 12 mm while the rest of the graft remained undilated.There was no valve observed inside the graft that could have otherwise impeded the flow.No major difference in thickness between this section of the graft to other section of the graft was observed.However, this section of the graft appears to have experienced some trauma to the intima of the vein.At this time, we cannot confirm if there was a thrombosis or it was a weak vessel wall that contributed to vessel aneurysm.A histology report comparing this dilated section of the graft to undilated section of the graft is currently pending.Surgeon confirmed that the graft was properly flushed with heparin.As stated in our ifu, adverse events including thrombosis/occlusion of the graft could occur with the use of this vascular access graft.Our procol clinical data had shown that the graft may require intervention prior to 6 months after implant.The results from the preclinical and clinical data provide reasonable assurance that the procol device is safe and effective for patients who already have at least one failed prosthetic access graft.There was no injury to the patient as the result of the incident.A new procol graft was implanted to replace the explanted graft.
|