Based on review of system log files and the videos captured from each of the surgeries performed, the visumax device worked according to specifications.As reported by the hcp, the issue with the patient's vision was a due to the other hcp's action (i.E.Creation of a "third cut") while removing the lenticule during the smile surgery.A device evaluation was not performed since there was no allegation of a device malfunction.
|
On (b)(6) 2018, a healthcare professional (hcp) initiated a circle surgery to improve the visual acuity of a patient that previously underwent a smile surgery performed by a different hcp from the same facility with the same visumax device.Prior to the circle surgery, it was reported that the patient had a visual acuity of 8/10 with refraction on the right eye (od) that cannot be improved with correction.During the circle surgery, after having created the circle cut and during the removal of the flap, the surgeon found that the corneal stroma on the visual axis had been damaged during the smile surgery (by creation of a "third cut") by the other hcp from the same facility.Therefore, the hcp decided to stop the circle surgery.Two days after the circle surgery, the patient's visual acuity was checked by the hcp and reported to be 5/10.The hcp reported that he plans to see the patient again in a month to generate topography images, and perform tomography scans and a slit lamp exam.No further details are known at this time.
|