There was no death associated with the alleged event.No information to suggest the patient sustained a serious injury.Device evaluation summary: electrode belt sn (b)(4) was returned and evaluated at the distributor, in accordance with procedures recommended by zoll manufacturing corporation.The evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files on the day of the event and incoming functional testing.The review of the software flags consisted of an analysis of the downloaded data to identify any fault flags or unusual patterns of software flags.The software flag files did not suggest a device malfunction that would contribute to the inappropriate treatment.During the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the ecg electrodes, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper delivery of a full energy 150j biphasic pulse.The functional testing confirmed proper ecg acquisition and pulse delivery functionality.Device evaluation of monitor sn (b)(4) has been completed.The reported problem (treatment) is unable to be confirmed.As received, the monitor would not power on.Upon evaluation, there were multiple components damaged on the computer / analog (ca) board and defibrillator board.The cause of the inability to power on is the damaged components.The cause of the damaged components is high voltage deviation to low voltage circuitry.The primary cause of the shock event is unknown due to the loss of ecg and flag data.The primary cause of the detection is unknown due to the loss of ecg data.
|