Model Number PVS25 |
Device Problem
Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 10/10/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned prosthesis valve was received in general good conditions.The returned accessories were received blood stained.Given that the surgeon apparently converted to full-sternotomy after the initial implant attempt, it is possible that the surgical approach contributed to the reported event.Additionally, given that a size 21 perimount valve was ultimately implanted, mis-sizing may also have been a contributing factor.
|
|
Event Description
|
A perceval valve was implanted on (b)(6) 2018.The physician stated that, during sizing, the large sizer passed through easily, while the medium (pvs25) sizer sat on the annulus.It was reported that the physician had difficulty removing the holder from the valve, but that the valve positioning looked good after it was removed.After weaning from bypass, paravalvular leak was identified.The aorta was then reopened, and folding of the valve was identified.The physician performed a full sternotomy, explanted the perceval valve and implanted a size 21 perimount valve.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Valve was implanted via full sternotomy, not mini-sternotomy.
|
|
Event Description
|
A perceval valve was implanted on (b)(6) 2018 via full sternotomy.It was reported that the physician had difficulty removing the holder from the valve, but that the valve positioning looked good after it was removed.After weaning from bypass, paravalvular leak was identified.The aorta was then reopened, and folding of the valve was identified.The physician performed a full sternotomy, explanted the perceval valve and implanted a size 21 perimount valve.It was reported that the physician could also have implanted a size 23 perimount valve.The patient outcome was good.
|
|
Event Description
|
A perceval valve was implanted on (b)(6) 2018 via mini-sternotomy.It was reported that the physician had difficulty removing the holder from the valve, but that the valve positioning looked good after it was removed.After weaning from bypass, paravalvular leak was identified.The aorta was then reopened, and folding of the valve was identified.The physician performed a full sternotomy, explanted the perceval valve and implanted a size 21 perimount valve.The patient outcome was good.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A complete manufacturing and material records review for the device has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.Visual inspection of the returned prosthesis did not reveal any elements of non-conformity.A collapsing simulation was performed, and the valve was successfully collapsed without observing any anomalies.A subsequent deployment simulation was performed, and did not reveal any anomalies.No paravalvular leak was identified after the valve was deployed.Based on the performed analyses, the reported event cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic to the involved device.Given that a size 21 perimount valve was ultimately implanted, the event can reasonably be attributed to mis-sizing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|