The engineering evaluation noted that the revision reported was stated to be the result of disassociation of the center cage and one of the three peripheral pegs from the polyethylene body of the glenoid component; the result of this analysis confirmed that observation.The cause of this disassociation was inconclusive though it was likely cause by damage to the central peg at the time of the glenoid implantation or by eccentric humeral head edge loading, as evidence by the burnishing along the peripheral of the glenoid articular body.
|