• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3300TFX21MM
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pulmonary Valve Stenosis (2024)
Event Date 11/05/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi #: (b)(4).Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.Although edwards was unable to perform device analysis, this event was most likely due to a progression of the patient¿s underlying valvular disease pathology combined with the patient¿s other underlying risk factors which included hydronephrosis of left kidney, essential hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.However, the stenosis in this case was likely impacted by the progression of the patient¿s underlying valvular disease pathology with or without structural valve deterioration and/or nonstructural dysfunction.In addition, other patient risk factors such as the patient¿s younger age at implant likely contributed to this event.The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 21mm pericardial aortic valve, implanted in the pulmonary position, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of two (2) years, 11 months due to severe pulmonic stenosis.The tpvr procedure was initially attempted with a 23mm edwards transcatheter valve, but it was unsuccessful as it would not cross the pre-existing valve.A second 23mm edwards transcatheter valve was deployed successfully.The peak gradient improved from 44mmhg to 7mmhg.The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transferred to the pacu in stable condition.The patient was deemed stable to be discharge home on pod #1.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural related factors may have caused or contributed to the event.The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key8106158
MDR Text Key128471703
Report Number2015691-2018-04888
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P860057/S042
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/12/2019
Device Model Number3300TFX21MM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/23/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age32 YR
-
-