Our product evaluation laboratory received one model 744f75 swan-ganz catheter.As received, the catheter passed in-vitro calibration and attenuation test with the lab cal-cup; however, the balloon was found to be torn at the interior edges of both the proximal and distal bonds extending around the catheter.The missing piece of latex was not returned.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visible damage was observed from the catheter body or the returned syringe.A device history record review was completed and documented that the device met all specifications upon distribution.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint; however, the customer report of a svo2 issue was not confirmed on evaluation, as the device responded appropriately during functional testing.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.It is standard practice to check balloon integrity by inflating it to the recommended volume in order to detect any asymmetry or leakage condition before use of the catheter.When there is separation of the balloon or fragments from the pulmonary artery catheter, the retained fragment will embolize to the lungs.Due to the large surface area of the pulmonary vasculature, this is generally well tolerated, but can lead to complications such as infection or small infarction.Pulmonary complications may result from improper inflation technique.To avoid damage to the pulmonary artery and possible balloon rupture, the balloon should not be inflated above the recommended volume.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|