• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LDR MÉDICAL AV L ANCHORING PLATE IMPACTOR; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LDR MÉDICAL AV L ANCHORING PLATE IMPACTOR; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/16/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This medwatch is submitted to send the an initial report for this complaint except for the anchoring plate : the review of the device history records and traceability did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Information requests are in progress to obtain more information about the incident investigations ongoing conclusion not yet available.
 
Event Description
Avenue l : jammed implant and instrument.Detected at field return on (b)(6) 2018 : impact on head of instrument and anchoring plate broken and jammed in (ir90019r), handle jammed on implant-holder (ig002r), impactor jammed on implant-holder (ir90021r).
 
Event Description
Avenue l : jammed inserter and scratch.It was detected at field return on november 20th 2018 impact on head of instrument and anchoring plate jammed in (ir90019r-1), handle jammed on implant-holder (ig002r-avl) and impactor jammed (ir90021r).Additional information received on february 25th 2019, according to the reporter: the date of surgery was the date of sterilization written on the decontamination form, which was on (b)(6) 2018.No impact on patient was reported.No pre-, per- and post-op x-ray images are available.The reporter does not know where the missing piece of the broken anchoring plate jammed in the cage holder is.The reporter does not know whether or not a conflict with a posterior montage occurred during the surgery.The sales order of the surgery was received on march 1st 2019.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This medwatch is submitted to send the result of the investigation of this complaint following the additional information and product received.B3, b4, b5, d4, g1-2, g4, g7, h2 and h6 were updated.The product was received on november 19th 2018 with the decontamination form correctly completed and signed.A visual examination confirmed the reported event: the avenue l snap-on handle and avenue l anchoring plate impactor are jammed in the avenue l cage holder.The avenue l anchoring plate s is jammed in the avenue l cage holder.Moreover, there is a missing piece of the avenue l anchoring plate s.Impacts on head of the avenue l anchoring plate impactor can be observed.Product evaluation was performed by the project manager, whose result was received on february 12th 2019.Conflict marks can be observed on the anchoring plate, therefore it could be hypothesized that there was a conflict between the second anchoring plate and a posterior montage or with the first anchoring plate, meaning that the sterile starter awl was not used.The review of the device history records and the traceability of the avenue l cage holder, anchoring plate, handle and anchoring plate impactor did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Several attempts were made to the reporter to collect additional information on this event, especially concerning the patient's indications or the use of the sterile starter awl.Yet, no answer was received.From the information provided based on the zper, the product history records, the review of the case with the project manager, the recurrence of this type of event for this product and after having performed the product evaluation, the root cause of the event cannot be determined.Indeed, based on the product evaluation, it could be hypothesized that there was a conflict between the second anchoring plate and a posterior montage or with the first anchoring plate, meaning that the sterile starter awl was not used.Yet, crucial information, such as the patient's indications or the use of the sterile starter awl, was not provided.The investigation found no evidence of a device issue.The root cause of the reported event remains unknown with the most likely hypothesis of user error.If additional information is received that allows to draw a conclusion, this case will be reopened and the root cause of the complaint will be reevaluated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AV L ANCHORING PLATE IMPACTOR
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR  10300
MDR Report Key8188793
MDR Text Key131133116
Report Number3004788213-2018-00429
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/06/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberIR90021R
Device Lot Number410317619/05
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/12/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-