The patient tested herself on an at home urine pregnancy test on (b)(6) 2018-all three at home tests were negative.Another home urine pregnancy test was done on (b)(6) 2018 and was positive.The type/brand of home urine pregnancy test unknown.On (b)(6) 2018: due to the positive home test, the patient came into the facility to confirm her pregnancy.A new urine sample was collected at the facility and tested twice on the mckesson consult urine dipstick-both tests resulted in negative.The patient was insistent she was pregnant due to the positive home pregnancy test results.Her blood was collected and sent for confirmatory testing on (b)(6) 2018.(b)(6) 2018: the results became available.Beta quant=51 miu/ml.Based off serum results, the facility is determining patient to be pregnant.There was no treatment provided or withheld from the questionable negative mckesson consult urine dipstick result.The patient was referred to the ob department.
|
Investigation conclusion: an investigation was performed on retention and returned product from the reported lot number.Retention and returned devices were tested with qc cutoff standards (25 miu/ml).Results were read at 3 minutes.All devices yielded expected positive results and met qc specifications.No false negative results were observed during in-house testing.Manufacturing batch record review did not uncover any abnormalities and found that the lot met quality control specifications.A root cause could not be determined from the available information, as both retention and returned product performed as expected during in-house testing.False negative results may occur when the levels of hcg are below the sensitivity level of the test.Very dilute urine specimens, as indicated by a low specific gravity, may not contain representative levels of hcg.If pregnancy is still expected, a first morning urine specimen should be collected 48 hours later and tested.
|