The lot number was provided.A review of the approved device history records indicated the lot met all release criteria.A lot history trending review was performed and there were no similar complaints for this lot number.The stent, pusher, and introducer were returned for analysis.A new headway 17 was used for the investigation, as the original microcatheter used during the procedure was not returned.Upon initial investigation, there did not appear to be any damage to the stent.There did not appear to be any thrombus in the stent.The stent was reloaded into the introducer and the microcatheter without any friction.The stent deployed out of the distal end of the microcatheter as expected.The device functioned within specification.Based on the available information and investigation, the reported complaint is was unable to be confirmed.The stent was able to advanced through the microcatheter and deploy fully, and there was no evidence of thrombus.The root cause is unknown; however, the patient was not on dual antiplatelet therapy, along with possible tortuous anatomy may have caused the stent to lodge some of the thrombus onto the stent, which might have prevented the stent from opening fully.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies thrombus as potential a complication associated with use of the device.
|
It was reported that the proximal portion of the lvis stent did not open fully.The stent was removed through the microcatheter, and upon inspection outside the patient, thrombus was noted in the stent.The patient was not placed on dual antiplatelet therapy.There was no reported patient injury or intervention.The patient was reported to be doing okay.
|