Article citation: e.Riggio, e.Toffoli and c.Tartaglione et al., "local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer.Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery." journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Bjps.2018.10.016.(b)(4).The event of infection (unknown onset), inflammation/irritation, exposure, deflation, seroma, and necrosis are physiological complication and analysis of the device generally does not assist allergan in determining a probable cause for this event.These events are known potential adverse events addressed in the product labeling.
|
Through journal article 'local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer.Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery' the following complications, which did not necessitate revision surgery, were reported: infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, stretched skin and scar tension, pain in axillary and dorsal regions, skin necrosis, skin inflammation, hematoma and expander displacement (lateral).And the following complications, which did necessitate revision surgery, were reported: infection, skin inflammation, "cxposure" of tissue expander, breakage / damage of tissue expander, recurrent seroma, skin necrosis and severe lateral displacement of expander.No further treatment information or affected side were provided.Device status is currently unknown.
|