This medwatch is submitted to send the result of the investigation of this complaint.It was reported on january 22nd 2019 that the two anchoring plates references, 285664/5 and 740741, were invoiced the same date december 13th 2018.Therefore, it is unknown which one was used for the surgery.A review of the device history records of each product was done to ensure that there was no non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.The review of the device history records and traceablity of both anchoring plate reference did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Several attempts were made to the reporter to collect additional information on this event.Yet, no additional information was received.From the information provided based on the complaint description, the product history records, the review of the case with the product range manager and the recurrence of this type of event for this product, the investigation found no evidence to indicate a device related issue.Indeed, it could be hypothesized that the implant holder was badly manipulated, leading thus to a deterioration of the interface implant / implant holder.Consequently, the cage could have disadapted and moved back, as reported.It is clearly stated in the surgical technique to make sure the cage is perfectly stable and properly fixed on the cage holder (step 6: cage preparation).However, regarding the lack of information provided and without the product return and evaluation, this hypothesis cannot be validated.The root cause of this reported event remains undetermined with the most likely hypothesis of mishandling of cage and inserter assembly.If additional information is received that allows to draw a conclusion, this case will be reopened and the root cause of the complaint will be reevaluated.
|
Roi-a : cage moved back during impaction of anchoring plate according to the reporter , the cage moved during anchoring plate insertion.There was no patient impact , no surgery delay more than 30 min the cage was extracted and replaced with another one of the same reference.Severals attempts were made to collect additional informations about the event.No update received.No clarification , was received from the reporter to identify which anchoring plate lot is related to this event.The cage was discarded by the hospital and not returned to the manufacturer for examination.The anchoring plate related to this event was not returned to manufacaturer.
|