Initial reporter is synthes sales consultant.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.A review of the device history records has been requested.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, before an unknown procedure, the cutting edge of the drill bit was broken.The procedure was completed successfully with ten (10) minutes surgical delay.There was no other medical intervention required.The patient outcome after the procedure was unknown.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: b5: updated event description.E1: reporter's phone, email reported.H3, h4, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 309.600.Lot: f-12423.Manufacturing site: selzach.Supplier: (b)(4).Release to warehouse date: 24.Sept.2012.The device history record shows this lot of (b)(4) pieces was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Ncr# 3143806 was generated during production.This non-conformance is not relevant to the complaint condition since 28.Feb.2012.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the visual inspection has shown that the one cutting tip of three is broken off.The cutting edges of the drill bit are in a used condition.Dimensional inspection: the relevant features are heavy damaged in a manner which prevents accurate measurement of the features.Drawing/specification review: not required per selected investigation flow as root cause is use related.Material review: not required per selected investigation flow as root cause is use related.Summary: the visual inspection has shown that the drill bit tip is broken.Therefore, this complaint is rated as confirmed.Unfortunately we are not able to determine the exact cause of this complaint.The cutting edges of the drill bit are in a used condition.The broken surface is homogenous what indicates material conformity to the specification as well.Based on the provided information we are not able to determine the exact cause of this complaint.The wear and tear indicate that the product was often and intensive used instrument.We do suppose that the cause of the breakage is the result of a mechanical overload situation during use.Also prevent possible contact with other metallic parts during drilling may have caused these damages.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.H11 corrected data: e1: reporter's name; e3.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|