(b)(4).Investigation results: the returned device was contaminated.At initial visual exam, no obvious damage was noted.The burr was heavily soiled with bone residues and flaws of the diamonds were not visible.The burr was cleaned for one hour with "helizyme" and then cleaned with a water pistol and dried with compressed air.During visual inspection, clear bone remains were noted, so the burr head was brushed with a soft brush, the burr was then cleaned with water and dried with compressed air again.There were no signs of wear on the shaft.There were no traces of wear on the cutter coupling.There were no defects in the diamonds noted.The device history records for the reported lot number (52471949) were reviewed and found to be according to specification valid at the time of production.There is no indication for a material or manufacturing defect.No further complaints have been registered against this lot number.The heavy abrasion reported by the customer can not be confirmed.The failure may be related to wear and tear.The burr head of the diamond cutter shows normal wear, with no extraordinary grain loss noted.A minimal grain loss cannot be prevented.This is found in the instructions for use (ifu).The diamond cutter could still be used.According the warning in the ifu: danger of injury from foreign body reactions (e.G.Inflammation, encapsulation) if particles remain in the body! when using diamond tools, it is always possible for diamond grains/nickle particles to break away/off.Carefully rinse and vacuum while and after working with diamond tools.
|
It was reported that there was heavy abrasions/shavings of the drilling burr, which were deposited in the patient's tissue.The surgeon had difficulty removing all of the shavings.It is reported that x-ray was most likely taken.Additional information has been requested, however has not been provided at the time of this report.
|