• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKENTERPRISEENC
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the no lot number was provided by the customer.No device was received for analysis at this time.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.As reported in the literature publication entitled, ¿spontaneous delayed proximal migration of enterprise stent after staged treatment of wide necked basilar aneurysm: technical case report ¿ a (b)(6) year-old female patient with a large unruptured wide- necked basilar aneurysm and small unruptured right superior cerebellar and left anterior cerebral artery aneurysms underwent a two-stage enterprise stent assisted coil-embolization has experience stent migration.The stent has migrated proximally with all 4 distal tines of the stent within the neck of the aneurysm, and the proximal tines nearing the vertebral basilar junction.The decision was made to proceed with coil embolization as the stent position appeared to be in the ¿waffle cone¿ configuration.The aneurysm was then catheterized with a prowler-14 microcatheter (cordis neurovascular, inc.) over a synchro 2 soft guidewire.After this, cordis orbit coils (cordis neurovascular, inc.) were deployed into the aneurysm.The coil loops approached the left and right pca origins; however, excellent flow remained in these vessels.The aneurysm demonstrated no evidence of extravasation, and there was no evidence of distal branch occlusion on follow- up angiographic images.However, there was remaining flow in the aneurysm in the most dependent portion of the dome region.No additional coils were placed because of the thrombotic event.The intravenous reopro infusion was maintained overnight.The patient was then awakened from the general anesthetic and had no evidence of iatrogenic neurological deficit.Aim of this study: to demonstrate a unique technical issue with a relatively newly released intravascular stent used for adjunctive treatment of wide- necked cerebral aneurysms.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
949789-868
MDR Report Key8228886
MDR Text Key132508852
Report Number1226348-2019-00818
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/17/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/08/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKENTERPRISEENC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age48 YR
-
-