• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3MAXC
Device Problems Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/13/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2019-00079; 3005168196-2019-00081; 3005168196-2019-00082; 3005168196-2019-00083; 3005168196-2019-00088.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the basilar artery using penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheters (3maxcs), a penumbra system jetd reperfusion catheter (jetd), a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), penumbra system 3d revascularization device (3d) and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).It should be noted that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous, and the physician decided to take a radial approach.During preparation for the procedure, the first 3maxc became bent on the back table and was not used in the procedure.A second 3maxc was then advanced through a neuron max followed by a 3d; however, the 3d was unable to advance through the 3maxc beyond the v3 segment.Therefore, the 3d and the 3maxc were removed from the vessel and set aside.The physician then advanced the velocity through a jetd into the basilar artery using the same neuron max; however, the velocity was unable to advance to the target location.The velocity and jetd were therefore removed from the patient¿s vessel.During the next angiogram, the physician identified a radiopaque marker inside the patient¿s mid basilar artery.It was then noted that the second 3maxc used had fractured and remained in the patients vessel.The physician then attempted to advance a guidewire to the basilar artery to continue the procedure but was unable to advance it further.The guidewire was therefore removed.The physician then decided to end the procedure.However, the physician experienced difficultly removing the neuron max as the patient began having vasospasms.Upon removal of the neuron max, the procedure ended and the basilar artery remained occluded.It was reported that the patient passed away a few days later on (b)(6) 2018.It was also reported that the cause of death was respiratory arrest; however, the relationship between the fractured 3maxc tip and the cause of death is currently unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key8242969
MDR Text Key132916765
Report Number3005168196-2019-00080
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160449
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,12/14/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3MAXC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
-
-