Catalog Number 8065797102 |
Device Problem
Gas Output Problem (1266)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/26/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No gas tank sample has been received by manufacturing for evaluation.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Additional information has been requested.This is the second of two reports for this reported event.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A director of nurses reported that an ophthalmic gas and gas dispensing regulator valve were both used during a pars plana vitrectomy (ppv), membrane peel (mp) and internal limiting membrane (ilm) procedure.The instilled gas bubble was not successfully retained inside of the patient's eye.Additional information was requested and received.There was no impact to the patient and no additional treatment or intervention was required.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received further clarified that the ophthalmic gas was used at 14% concentration and was manually mixed with sterile, filtered air at a ratio of 8.5cc gas to 51.5% sterile air.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
One gas cylinder was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Per the manufacturer, the cylinder was in good condition and contained enough gas to analyze.The gas was analyzed by gas chromatograph (gc).The gc analysis confirmed the gas to be perfluoropropane with an air concentration of not more than 100 ppm and with no unusual gc peaks.The product met the release specification.Per the manufacturer, a review of the manufacturing records for the reported lot number showed no unusual issues.A check of the complaint records showed no other related complaints against the reported lot.A review of confirmed complaints showed no trends for reported event.Whenever a sample of a product that did not stay in the eye as long as expected was returned for testing, the sample has met all specifications for release.Per the manufacturer, the returned sample met specifications therefore, the root cause of the reported event could not be determined and no further actions will be pursued at this time.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|