It was reported that a revision surgery of the right hip was performed due to pain, also that the patient suffered a significant reaction to the metal on metal hip implant with discoloration, and osteolysis.During the revision, the bhr cup and bhr head were removed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the head and cup was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the head or cup.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The available medical documents were reviewed.The patient¿s reported pain, reaction to the mom hip implant with discoloration, and osteolysis which is noted in the legal claim cannot be confirmed, as the revision operative report does not provide details of osteolysis or avn.Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the reported reactions/events were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected post-surgical healing cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|