• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORPORATION THROMBUSTER II; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORPORATION THROMBUSTER II; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number T2R8SA4W
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/18/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records (dhr) of the device concerned were reviewed: the production lot, to which the device concerned belongs, passed all in-process inspections including the visual test (including the welded part of the distal tip) and the internal diameter measurement of gw lumen for every product, and the finished product inspections including the shaft tensile strength test and the withstand absorption pressure test on representative samples based on sampling plan.No nonconformity or abnormality in the manufacturing processes of the device concerned was found.The actual device concerned was returned and investigated: the distal tip (gw lumen shaft) was torn off from the catheter shaft (suction lumen shaft).Many small axial scratches were observed on the surface of the catheter shaft (especially, until the 30 mm from the distal).No particular damage or abnormal feature was observed on the other parts.Probable cause(s) and our comment: when the catheter was removed, the distal tip was trapped in the highly calcified cto lesions.(at this time, the small axial scratches on the catheter shaft were occured).Further attempt was made to pull out the device forcibly while the distal portion was trapped in the lesion.Then the distal tip trapped in the lesion was ripped away from the shaft.This situation may happen when operators try to pull the thrombuster ii into a gc (or a sheath device) too quickly and/or strongly.We believe the reported event was caused by not a defect or malfunction of the device but by a device handling issue.
 
Event Description
The device concerned "thrombuster ii" which has never distributed in us is similar to "xpress-way rx" distributed in us under 510(k) # k101839.The structure of the aspiration lumen is different from each other.The thrombuster ii was approached from above knee (ak) to highly calcified cto lesions of the anterior tibial artery (ata).After the thrombus aspiration, the physician had a feeling of strangeness while the catheter was removed and noticed that there was no distal part of the catheter.The broken distal tip was retrieved through the sheath by pushing it up using coyote balloon dilatation catheter (boston scientific, 2.0 mm).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THROMBUSTER II
Type of Device
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORPORATION
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8 288
JA  530-8288
Manufacturer Contact
yoshiyuki kitamura
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8-288
JA   530-8288
MDR Report Key8255618
MDR Text Key133316733
Report Number3009761573-2018-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K101839
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/16/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Catalogue NumberT2R8SA4W
Device Lot NumberKP098143
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/25/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-