• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION OBTRYX II SYSTEM - HALO; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION OBTRYX II SYSTEM - HALO; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068505110
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/12/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) captures the reportable event of mesh torn.An examination of the returned device found that on one side of the mesh, the mesh is stretched and torn/split down the middle.Its corresponding leader loop was not cut, indicating that the mesh separated/tore away from the leader loop.There are tool marks on the blue dilator.No damage was noted to the delivery device.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.It is likely that operational factors, such as user handling/technique, device tensioning/adjustment, and patient anatomy, contributed to the reported complaint.The tool marks on the dilator also suggest that excessive force was encountered.Therefore, the most probable cause for this complaint is adverse event related to procedure, which indicates that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on the event.
 
Event Description
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to the second of two devices used during the procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that two obtryx ii system - halo devices were used during an insertion of sub-urethral sling procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, for the first device, the mesh snapped from arms during pulling of the sleeves.A second device was opened and the same issue occurred.The procedure was completed with an advantage fit system.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.This event has been deemed reportable based on the investigation results: the mesh was stretched and torn/split down the middle.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OBTRYX II SYSTEM - HALO
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key8256841
MDR Text Key133353167
Report Number3005099803-2019-00154
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
UDI-Device Identifier08714729837565
UDI-Public08714729837565
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K121754
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/17/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/17/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/19/2019
Device Model NumberM0068505110
Device Catalogue Number73207
Device Lot Number0000037402
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/19/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/07/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/04/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-