According to the customer: change out from december 30th: lot=70124018.Change out time=~1min-> sat drop to 55% (from 90%) and pt became slightly.Hypotensive/bradycardic, but recovered within 3 mins of reinitiation of ecmo.Pt status= still on ecmo.Additional info: oxygenator was in use for 12 days prior to change out (this was this pts 2nd change out); (b)(6) yo m on vv ecmo for hypercapnic resp failure; there were some small clots formed on the pre membrane.Pre oxy- 7.38/73/33/42/62%.Post oxy- 7.43/62/183/40/98%.Primary reason for change out: thoracic surgery's decision based on pre/post marginal gases.Outcome: no big change in pt gases, but post po2 on new oxy was greatly improved (536 mmhg).Internal reference: (b)(4).
|
Maquet medical systems,usa(importer)submits this report on behalf of the legal manufacturer of the device maquet cardiopulmonary (b)(4).Rastatt, germany.A follow-up medwatch will be submitted when additional information becomes available.Reference exemption # (b)(4).Importer- maquet medical systems usa (b)(4).Contact person- (b)(6).The returned oxygenator was investigated in the laboratory of the manufacturer.A quadrox-id adult with tubes and a foreign centrifugal was sent back.The complete set was heavily clotted.Tubes were removed and disposed of.Clots can be confirmed.The oxygenator was with a foreign centrifugal pump applied.Since the oxygenator is not leaking, is a tightness test is not necessary.Oxygenator and the foreign centrifugal pump was cleaned several times with sodium hypochlorite purified.To ensure performance of the products prior to shipment, checks, controls, and performance tests are carried out during the manufacture of the products.These tests can be reviewed as part of a dhr review.Dhr review result: affected product: 70106.7859 beq-hmod70000-usa #squadrox-id ad.O.Fil basic lot 70124017 and packaging lot 70124018 ( udi number (b)(4)).The avz from avp420 to avp434 (dms#2559809) was reviewed on (b)(6)2019.There were no references found, which are indicating a nonconformance of the product in question.Additionally a review of the weekly performance monitoring according to si-c-09 has been reviewed (dms#2573979), the performance tests passed the acceptance criteria thus the failure could not be confirmed based on the results obtained during investigation at this time the cause of the reported incident was determined to not be attributed to a device related malfunction.
|