• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Bradycardia (1751); Stroke/CVA (1770); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 10/25/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date is literature article published date journal article title: endovascular treatment for near occlusion of the internal carotid artery 30-day outcome and long-term follow-up k.Akkan et al.Clinical neuroradiology (2018) 28:245-252 © springer-verlag berlin heidelberg 2016 10.1007/s00062-016-0546-8.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Background: the treatment strategy and the correct incidence of near occlusion (no) of the internal carotid artery (ica) is still controversial.In routine radiological imaging no can easily be misdiagnosed as complete occlusion and there is no consensus on the standard treatment strategy.Purpose to present our perioperative and long-term follow up results of ica no patients treated with carotid artery stenting (cas).Material and methods: patients were treated with spider fx and protégé.Between 2004¿2014 a total of 182 patients with ica no were evaluated for cas.The study included 132 male (72.5 %) and 50 female (27.5 %) patients with a mean age of 70.2 years.For distal protection a spiderfx was used in 140 patients and a protégé in 83 patients.Patients underwent a clinical neurological evaluation and radiological imaging of the carotid arteries before the cas procedure.Of the patients 80 (44 %) were asymptomatic.The median clinical and carotid doppler ultrasound (dus) follow-up period was 64 months (range 18¿124 months).Temporary hemodynamic changes, such as bradycardia in 108 patients, hypotension in 55 patients and asystole in 19 patients occurred during post dilation and were managed with intravenous 1 mg atropine in all cases.Results in 182 patient¿s cas were performed, 4 patients (2.2 %) developed minor stroke, 2 patients (1.1 %) developed myocardial infarction, 7 patients developed restenosis, during the follow up period 21 patients died (12 from vascular causes [8 myocardial infarctions and 4 pulmonary embolism] and 9 from nonvascular diseases).Asymptomatic restenosis was detected in seven patients (3.8 %) in the follow-up period.Conclusion: with sufficient neurological evaluation during pretreatment and posttreatment periods and when the procedure is performed with technologically developed products by an experienced interventional team, cas is beneficial in patients with ica no.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key8291898
MDR Text Key134567624
Report Number2183870-2019-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/31/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/09/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-