It was reported that a revision surgery from the right hip severe pain, metallosis, adverse local tissue reaction, trunnionosis, need for revision surgery, ongoing pain and suffering, and limited mobility.
|
It was reported that hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the hemi head, modular sleeve and r3 liner were removed.The bhr cup and stem remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the r3 shell, r3 liner, hemi head and modular sleeve was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the r3 shell and r3 liner.Similar complaints have been identified for the hemi head and modular sleeve.This failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as a result of the reported event.The available medical documents were reviewed.It cannot be determined to what extent the patient¿s daily cocaine and marijuana usage had on his pain and clinical status.Per the surgical technique, the acetabular component is to be impacted with 15-20° of anteversion and 40-45° inclination angle.However, the intraoperative report and x-ray indicated the acetabular component was implanted at approximately 25-33° anteversion.It is unknown if the increased anteversion of the acetabular component led to accelerated wear and metallosis.Without the supporting lab/pathology results or analysis of the explant, the root cause of the reported pain, and trunnionosis cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|