Model Number M00542251 |
Device Problems
Positioning Failure (1158); Defective Device (2588); Failure to Fire (2610)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/22/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).According to the complainant, the suspect device has been disposed and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that three speedband superview super 7 devices were used in the esophagus during an esophageal variceal ligation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, it was noted that the suture wire was hidden in the ligator cap which caused difficulty setting up the device.Consequently, the bands would not deploy successfully inside the patient.The same issue occurred with the second and third speedband superview super 7 devices.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that three speedband superview super 7 devices were used in the esophagus during an esophageal variceal ligation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, it was noted that the suture wire was hidden in the ligator cap which caused difficulty setting up the device.Consequently, the bands would not deploy successfully inside the patient.The same issue occurred with the second and third speedband superview super 7 devices.The procedure was completed with another speedband superview super 7 device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Problem code 2610 captures the reportable issue of bands failed to deploy.Problem code 2588 captures the reportable event of suture stuck inside the ligator cap.A speedband superview super 7 was returned with the ligator head for analysis.A visual examination of the ligator head found no visual defects with the handle assembly; however, the suture was noted to be incorrectly positioned inside the ligator cap.A functional evaluation was performed by rotating the handle knob 180 degrees, an audible click was heard and indents were felt.This failure is likely due to problems traced to manufacturing process.Therefore, the most probable root cause is manufacturing deficiency.An investigation to address this issue has been completed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.A labeling review was performed and from the information available this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|