SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKNOWN BHR DEVICE; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Noise, Audible (3273); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 02/06/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a revision surgery from the right hip was performed due to allergic reaction to the metal-on- metal rubbing, metal debris, popping, pain, grinding and different leg lengths.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision the hemi head & modular sleeve were removed.The acetabular cup & stem remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Without definitive part/lot numbers a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.A review of the complaint history review was performed using the part number for a 74122550 hemi head 50mm, 74120150 acetabular cup 50mm & 74222300 modular sleeve +4mm.Similar complaints have been identified and this failure will continue to be monitored.Without the details of the devices involved in this complaint, the specific product labelling and ifus for the devices cannot be reviewed.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The medical documents were reviewed.It should be noted bhr is contraindicated in patients with known or suspected metal sensitivity.It cannot be determined to what extent the patient¿s fractured ilium and displaced fragment and advanced facet arthropathy had on her pain and clinical status.Cannot confirm leg-length discrepancy with the documentation provided.Pain, inflammation and adverse tissue reaction are findings associated with an allergic response.However, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|