• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION SHUNT SENSOR SYS500; BLOOD GAS MONITOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION SHUNT SENSOR SYS500; BLOOD GAS MONITOR Back to Search Results
Model Number CDI510H
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 02/08/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Terumo has not received the device for evaluation; therefore, the investigation has yet to be completed.Terumo plans on submitting a follow-up report when the investigation is complete and when more information becomes available.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported to terumo cardiovascular that after cardiopulmonary bypass, a blood leakage from the large blue luer was observed.There was a blood loss of 10ml or less.Product was not changed out.Procedure was completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations ¿ and as indicated by terumo cardiovascular systems in the initial report submitted to the fda on feb 27, 2019.Upon further investigation of the reported event, the following information is new and/or changed: (device evaluation anticipated by manufacturer ¿ a second follow-up will be submitted upon completion of the investigation and/or submission of new information, thus tcvs references conclusions code 11.) all available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations.Upon further investigation of the reported event, the following information is new and/or changed: d4 (additional device information - added exp date).G4 (date received by manufacturer).G7 (indication that this is a follow-up report).H2 (follow-up due to additional information and device evaluation).H3 (device evaluated by manufacturer).H4 (device manufacture date).H6 (identification of evaluation codes 10, 11, 3331, 213, 67).Method code #1: 10 - actual device evaluated.Method code #2: 11 - testing of device from same lot/batch retained by manufacturer.Method code #3: 3331 - analysis of production records.Results code: 213 - no device problem found.Conclusions code: 67 - no problem detected.The returned sample was visually inspected.It was noted to contain dried blood within the threads of the large bore cap.The returned sample was then leak tested (as received) by connecting with the calibrated manometer, submerged into a water bath, and pressurized up to 1030 mmhg.A leak was noted from the large bore adaptor at approximately 90 mmhg.The large blue cap was then loosened and retightened by hand.The unit was then pressurized with air, submerged in a water bath, and observed for any leaks.A leak was noted again from the large blue luer cap at approximately 200 mmhg.The shunt sensor was then soaked in di water.After loosening and re-tightening the blue large bore adapter a second time (removing/loosening dried blood residue), the sample was leak tested again by connecting with the calibrated manometer, submerged into a water bath, and pressurized up to 1030 mmhg, and no leaks were noted.The second leak was most likely attributed to dried blood within the threads of the sensor connections that was not fully removed during decontamination.A retention sample from the same lot number was visually inspected and confirmed to have no traces of buffer on the outside of the unit or inside the pouch.The retention sample was then pressurized with air up to 1030 mmhg, submerged in a water bath, and observed for any leaks.No leaks were noted on the retention sample.The root cause for this event was determined to be the large blue vent cap for shunt sensor was not fully tightened either during setup of the circuit, or after the gas calibration.When the large blue vent cap was loosened, it had not been re-tightened fully prior to use in the line, causing a leak from the cap.All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHUNT SENSOR SYS500
Type of Device
BLOOD GAS MONITOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
125 blue ball road
elkton MD 21921
MDR Report Key8373488
MDR Text Key139188107
Report Number1124841-2019-00058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRY
UDI-Device Identifier00699753160767
UDI-Public(01)00699753160767
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K972962
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/27/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2019
Device Model NumberCDI510H
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberWM08D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/22/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/27/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-