Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Occlusion (1984); Thrombosis (2100); Stenosis (2263)
|
Event Date 02/01/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Date of event, implant date: estimated dates.The absorb device is currently not commercially available in the u.S; however, it is similar to a device sold in the u.S.Product performance engineering reviewed the incident information; however, there was no reported device malfunction and the product was not returned.A review of the lot history record and complaint history could not be conducted because the part and lot number were not provided.The reported patient effects of occlusion and thrombosis, as listed in the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (bvs) system, absorb, instructions for use are known adverse events associated with the use of a coronary scaffold in native coronary arteries.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture or labeling of the device.The unk xience device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report.Literature: "clinical outcomes at 2 years of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease - aida trial sub-study.".
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through a research article that absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents and xience drug-eluting stents may be related to thrombosis and target vessel failure [occlusion].Specific patient information is documented as unknown.Details are listed in the article, title: "clinical outcomes at 2 years of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease - aida trial sub-study.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number: (b)(4).Unique device identifier (udi#): in the absence of a reported part number, the udi cannot be calculated.Product performance engineering reviewed the incident information; however, there was no reported device malfunction and the product was not returned as the scaffold remains in the anatomy.Based on the information reviewed, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects could not be determined, however the reported scaffold discontinuities appears to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient codes: 1888 labeled 2263 labeled 1969 labeled.Internal file number - (b)(4).Correction: outcomes attribute to adverse event.The stent remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Attachment: article.Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease - aida trial sub-study.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initially filed report, the following information was received via a full version of the research article: absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents may also be related to hemorrhage, stenosis and myocardial infarction.The thrombosis previously reported in absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents may occur due to the scaffold dismantling.Additionally xience drug-eluting stents may be related to vessel inflammation, stenosis and myocardial infarction.Details are listed in the attached article, title "clinical outcomes at 2 years of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease - aida trial sub-study".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|