• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOLIFE AB - 3005445717 LUCAS 3 CHEST COMPRESSION SYSTEM; COMPRESSOR, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOLIFE AB - 3005445717 LUCAS 3 CHEST COMPRESSION SYSTEM; COMPRESSOR, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL Back to Search Results
Model Number LUCAS 3
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 07/01/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Physio-control evaluated the customer¿s battery and verified the reported issue.Physio-control continues to investigate the reported issue and will submit a supplemental report on this event to the fda as provided by 21 cfr 803.56.
 
Event Description
The customer contacted physio-control to report that their lucas 3 battery emitting an electrical smell and then the battery vented through the plastic shell.The device was in a paused and alarmed state.It was also reported that the device was warm to the touch with a new battery installed.There was no patient use associated with the reported event.Upon evaluation of the customer¿s battery, physio-control observed evidence of material leakage from the cells of the battery.Per the cell material safety data sheet, these materials include flammable organic solvents and corrosive irritants.Thus potential hazards include chemical burns from cell material exposure to sensitive tissues (eyes, skin, respiratory, gastro/respiratory) and for thermal burns resulting from ignition of vented battery cell flammable solvents.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Physio-control further evaluated the battery and observed electrolyte residue, indicating electrolyte leakage from the cells.
 
Event Description
The customer contacted physio-control to report that their lucas 3 battery emitting an electrical smell and then the battery vented through the plastic shell.The device was in a paused and alarmed state.It was also reported that the device was warm to the touch with a new battery installed.There was no patient use associated with the reported event.Upon evaluation of the customer¿s battery, physio-control observed evidence of material leakage from the cells of the battery.Per the cell material safety data sheet these materials include flammable organic solvents and corrosive irritants.Thus potential hazards include chemical burns from cell material exposure to sensitive tissues (eyes, skin, respiratory, gastro/respiratory) and for thermal burns resulting from ignition of vented battery cell flammable solvents.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUCAS 3 CHEST COMPRESSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
COMPRESSOR, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOLIFE AB - 3005445717
scheelevagen 17
ideon science park
lund SE-22 3 70
SE  SE-223 70
Manufacturer (Section G)
JOLIFE AB - 3005445717
scheelevagen 17
ideon science park
lund SE-22 3 70
SE   SE-223 70
Manufacturer Contact
meg marseglia
11811 willows road ne
redmond, WA 98052
4258674000
MDR Report Key8384307
MDR Text Key137825036
Report Number0003015876-2019-00363
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
UDI-Device Identifier00883873861875
UDI-Public00883873861875
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161768
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLUCAS 3
Device Catalogue Number99576-000043
Device Lot Number2016-12-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/11/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/19/2019
Device Age2 YR
Event Location Ambulatory Surgical Facility
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-