The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left subclavian artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician attempted to place a ruby coil, however, the coil would not hold its position due to the high flow of the vessel.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.The physician then successfully placed a new ruby coil using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).The physician then attempted to reuse the first ruby coil, however felt resistance advancing the ruby coil into the lantern.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.A new ruby coil was then advanced into the target location; however, it would not safely hold its position due to the high flow in the vessel and, therefore, the coil was removed.The physician then did a contrast injection and decided to end the procedure because the existing embolization was sufficient.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|