The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak was confirmed but the exact cause remains unknown.One 4 fr dl powermidline catheter and one photo sample were returned for investigation.The sample shown in the photo contained the same characteristics as the returned sample.The catheter extended up to the 13 cm depth marker.Use residue was observed throughout the sample.The wings at the bifurcation hub were observed to be split.The splits were observed to be uneven.The sample was flushed with water using a 12 ml syringe and a leak was observed at the damaged location when flushing the red lumen.Microscopic observation of the split surfaces revealed the splits to be rough and granular.The splits appeared to have propagated at an angle.The internal surface of the damaged area was divided into two splits.One of the splits was observed to extend into the catheter lumen junction.Based on the condition of the returned sample, possible contributing factors include excessive manipulation, securement technique, sharp instrument damage.Since the leaks was confirmed to originate due to damage present on the winged hub, the complaint is confirmed but the exact cause remains unknown.A lot history review (lhr) of recs2614 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|