The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat two splenic artery aneurysms using ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to deploy a pod6 into the outflow vessel using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), the physician determined that the pod6 was oversized.Therefore, it was removed undamaged and a pod5 was placed instead.Next, the physician successfully placed a ruby coil in the first aneurysm.While attempting to place another ruby coil in the aneurysm, the ruby coil started to kick out and was therefore removed.It was reported the kicking was likely due to the aneurysm being small and the physician thought there was already thrombus in it.The physician then successfully placed a smaller ruby coil in the aneurysm.The physician had intended to re-use the previously removed ruby coil for the second aneurysm, but its pusher assembly was kinked while being rinsed in saline.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coils, pod packing coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|