• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068318170
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/07/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Manufacturing site: although the current manufacturing site for uphold lite is boston scientific in (b)(4), the reported lot involved in this complaint was manufactured by: freudenberg medical (b)(4).An examination of the returned capio slim suture capturing device and uphold mesh revealed that on the blue/white dilator, the dart was missing from the suture near to where the suture interacts with the carrier.The dart was not returned.The protective sleeves, leader loops and mesh appeared intact.There was no damage noted to the capio slim suture capturing device.The dart of the blue dilator was loaded into the capio slim device.The carrier and dart were extended and retracted into the cage with no issue.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.An investigation determined that the root cause is inadequate design/design controls: the design of the carrier allows the fiber portion of the suture to interact with the sharp edge of the carrier, resulting in the suture severing.An investigation is in place to address the failure of dart detachment.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold lite with capio slim device was used during an anterior prolapse repair with uphold lite procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, upon first deployment of the device, the dart was unable to penetrate the tissue.It was then noticed that the dart detached from the suture.Reportedly, the dart did not detach inside the patient.The procedure was completed with another uphold lite with capio slim.There was no serious injury reported as a result of the event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UPHOLD LITE
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREUDENBERG MEDICAL
2301 centennial boulevard
jefferson IN 47130
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key8485673
MDR Text Key141008385
Report Number3005099803-2019-01640
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
UDI-Device Identifier08714729839200
UDI-Public08714729839200
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTW
PMA/PMN Number
K122459
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/04/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2020
Device Model NumberM0068318170
Device Catalogue Number831-817
Device Lot Number0000061422
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/26/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age64 YR
Patient Weight64
-
-