• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Problem Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 04/03/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the physician intended to use a protege rx stent to treat a lesion in the common carotid artery.The lesion was not pre-dilated.There was no damage noted to the packaging and no issues noted when removing the device from the tray.The device was prepped without issue.A spiderfx was used as embolic protection.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent, no resistance was encountered nor excessive force used when advancing the device to the lesion.The spider was deployed at the site and the stent was deployed at the intended target lesion without issue.Upon withdrawal, the devices became stuck and locked up with each other.A 3x8mm balloon was used at the iliac artery to anchor the spider wire and a cut down was performed to change to a ¿mono rail system¿.The devices were retrieved.The patient was transferred to icu and is reported to be doing well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: upon withdrawal the stent's inner sheath stuck to the spider.The inner sheath was removed, the inner wire was cut down and removed.The stent delivery system was withdrawn, and the spider was retrieved using its blue retrieval portion.No surgical intervention was required to remove the devices.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the spiderfx device was examined: the device was returned with the capture wire observed out of the dual ended delivery catheter.A kink was observed on the spiderfx capture wire.A fracture of the proximal end of the capture wire was noted.Multiple kinks and tensional stretching were noted on the blue recovery end of the dual ended catheter.No abnormality was noted on the green delivery end of the dual catheter.No abnormality observed on the spiderfx filter.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Image review: one image was received from the customer.Per the image, a detachment of the inner distal assembly proximal to the retainer.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key8487141
MDR Text Key141050113
Report Number2183870-2019-00163
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/24/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/05/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/20/2019
Device Catalogue NumberSEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Lot NumberA526994
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/20/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient Weight52
-
-