The returned device, intended for use in treatment, was returned as an mdr for evaluation.There was no relationship found between the devices and the reported incident.Visual inspection shows no manufacturing abnormalities on the device.The instrument was returned with an open bracket.During the "functional" evaluation an attempt was made to test the basic functions of this "instrument".The "first" step of the trigger performed as intended; the second step of the trigger performed as specified and the needle could be deployed/fired as intended; after releasing and squeezing the lever the jaw closed and the needle grasp the cobraid blue 38¿ test suture and "deploy" the needle through an om 3003 test tissue foam model.No functional issues were detected during the tests; the complaint was not verified and the root cause could not be defined with certainty.Factors that have nothing to do with the design and manufacture of the devices and that may have contributed to the complaint event are (1) excessive force is be applied to the device when manipulating soft tissue, bone, or hard objects (2)instrument used as a lever for manipulating hard tissue or bone.There were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|