Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(6).A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, during coronary artery bypass grafting (cabg) sternal closure, the trigger handle of the application instrument for sternal zipfix/tensioning device did not come out automatically while releasing tension.The malfunction occurred after using the device multiple times.The closure was completed by manually pulling the trigger handle apart and squeezing it.There was a 20-minute surgical delay.Patient outcome was unknown.This complaint involves one (1) device.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device history records review was completed for part: 03.501.080, lot: l718109.Manufacturing location: hägendorf, release to warehouse date: jun 15, 2018.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance were identified.The functional tests performed on the returned device, after lubrication, according to surgical technique shows that the device works as intended.Therefore, the ¿not lubricated¿ condition of the returned device may have been the root cause why the instrument did not tension as expected in the surgery.No design issue was identified with the returned device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|