Two lot numbers were provided by the customer.A device history record review was conducted on lot numbers 5w18l012 and 5w18s001.No exception was recorded in the device history records that could lead to the reported incident.Based on supplier investigation, the device history record review did not indicate any exception that could lead to the reported incident.Manufacturing checked the raw material supply, the formulation, the production process and the retained samples, no abnormality was found.The raw materials are coming from the qualified suppliers and it is tested by the lab before use.In the compounding process, the raw materials are mixed by formulation and the parameters are controlled within level and no abnormal situation occurred.One box of samples were returned for lot number 5w18s001.Samples have been forwarded on for skin irritation testing.Manufacturing reviewed irritation test reports conducted in 2010, the test results show that there is not a primary dermal irritant.At this time the root cause could not be determined.Manufacturing will intensify the inspection of the parameters during production, to ensure they are within the standard, and increase the donning test.
|
Based on information received from the customer, the lab tech reportedly had a skin reaction to the glove.They sought medical treatment, however the treatment they received is unknown.Two lot numbers were provided by the customer; however, they are unsure as to the lot number that may have caused the skin irritation.The lab tech is now using a cloth liner under the glove.
|