Ref e-complaint-(b)(4).Investigation: x-initiated manufacturer's investigation, x-no sample returned, x-review dhr.Analysis and findings: a review of the 2 year complaint history for the transwarmer inf,box of 6, part: 20421 shows one more similar complaint on file.The transwarmer is a purchased product.There were no product returned for evaluation, hence the complaint cannot be confirmed.A review of the incoming inspection records for the transwarmer inf for lot ik147 shows the products were to specification upon receipt.The complaint condition was assessed by vendor.As per the vendor assessment, " dhr ik147 was reviewed for any associated defects or non-conforming material reports and none were found to be present during production.There is no indication that the product will be returned for review, if it does, complaint response will be updated with findings." upon further analysis based on the follow up questions from the customer, the result can be deduced that there was a leak in the transwarmer used, which might have resulted in the drop of heat.Referring to the customer data, its an isolated incident and there were no consequences to the patient.Root cause can be deduced most possibly to be shipping/handling damage which led to the leak in the product which resulted in the drop of the heat retention capability in the product.Coopersurgical will continue to monitor this complaint condition for any trends.Correction and/or corrective action, none.No changes to the process or procedure.Was the complaint confirmed? no.Preventative action activity: coopersurgical will continue to monitor this complaint condition for any trends.
|