On (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent a plif procedure, during which a pl cage was implanted.The patient reported back pain postoperatively and visited the hospital.Infection was suspected.Patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2019, during which the surgeon noted the cage did not heal and could easily be removed.The surgeon removed the cage and placed the autologous bone in the ilium to complete the surgery.
|
Visual, dimensional, functional inspection, and material analysis could not be performed as the device was not returned.Complaint and device history records were not reviewed as a valid lot number was not provided and could not be obtained.It is unknown if there were any complications during initial procedure, no x rays are available and there was no medical intervention for the infection.There was no fusion, fall or post op trauma.No reported device malfunction for the tritanium pl cage.According to the ifu: "potential risks identified with the use of this intervertebral body fusion device, which may require additional surgery, include: device component fracture, loss of fixation, pseudoarthrosis (i.E.Non-union), fracture of the vertebrae, neurological injury, and vascular or visceral injury." the cage was implanted for a period of 2 months and the patient did not fuse.There was no reported failure of the tritanium pl cage.Non union can occur for any of the potential reasons outlined in the ifu.
|
On (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent a plif procedure, during which a pl cage was implanted.The patient reported back pain postoperatively and visited the hospital.Infection was suspected.Patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2019, during which the surgeon noted the cage did not heal and could easily be removed.The surgeon removed the cage and placed the autologous bone in the ilium to complete the surgery.
|