• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC. MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number FG-11881
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Vitrectomy (2643); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 04/22/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.The device history records were reviewed for this manufacturing lot and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.Based on the information reviewed, the event was attributed to use error and there is no evidence to indicate the presence of a potential quality issue with respect to manufacturing, design, or labeling.Capsular bag damage and dropped nuclear fragments are inherent risks of cataract surgery [reference: schaal s, nesmith blw, ihnen ma, al-latayfeh m.Current medical and surgical management of retained lens fragments after cataract extraction.Us ophthalmic review 2014; 7 (2): 95-99].Manufacturer's reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A patient underwent cataract surgery in the right eye on (b)(6) 2019 where the miloop was used to section the cataractous lens into fragments.After the first lens sectioning with the miloop, the surgeon had difficulty rotating the lens so company personnel suggested to the surgeon that one cut was sufficient and recommended not proceeding with a second cut.However, the surgeon elected to perform a second cut and inadvertently inserted the miloop too far posteriorly with the tip of the housing tube beyond the center of the capsule and the posterior capsule subsequently ruptured.Half of the lens dislocated into the vitreous and the other half was removed with anterior vitrectomy.A three-piece intraocular lens was implanted uneventfully and the patient was referred to a retina specialist to retrieve the lens fragment.Additional information was requested from the surgeon, who reports that retinal surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019.The patient's initial postoperative best corrected visual acuity (bcva) was 20/40, improving to 20/30 at last examination on (b)(6) 2019.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's reference #: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MILOOP LENS FRAGMENTATION DEVICE
Type of Device
OPHTHALMIC HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC CATARACT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
8748 technology way
reno NV 89521
MDR Report Key8620833
MDR Text Key145411871
Report Number3012123033-2019-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/17/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/21/2021
Device Model NumberFG-11881
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/22/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-