B4: 11-may-2021.D5: patient/consumer.D8: no.G1: mr.(b)(6).G2: company representative.G3: 11-may-2021.G6: follow-up # 1.H2: additional information, device evaluation.H3: yes.H6: health effect - clinical: 1930.Health effect - impact: 4627.Medical device product code: 2682.Type of investigation: 10, 3331.Investigation findings: 140.Investigation conclusions: 4315.H10: it was reported that the patient revised due to pain 1.5 years after implantation.The radiographic images were reviewed and show the implant to be undersized.In addition, there appears to be bone spur growth at c6/c7 both anterior and posterior the implant.Lack of pre-op, immediate post-op, interim timepoint, or flexion/extension images hindered further interpretation.The implant was not intact as-received.The device showed no evidence of mechanical failure.According to the provided information, the device was removed for pain and suspected infection and was attached to the vertebral bone and had to be destroyed to be removed.It was noted that tissue samples were taken for histological analysis and microbiological culture; however, no results were provided and it was not clear if infection was confirmed and contributed to, or was the cause of the failure of this procedure.
|