The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the device manufacture date and expiration date is unknown.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a blox bite block was used on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, after placing the bite block on the patient's mouth after sedation, a snapping sound was heard.The device was found broken and a fragment fell into the stomach.The broken fragment was removed from the patient's stomach using forceps.Another bite block was used to complete the procedure.There was no serious injury nor adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.
|
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the device manufacture date and expiration date is unknown.Block h6: device code 1562 captures the reportable event of bite block material separation.Block h10: a bite blox was received for analysis, along with the piece that had reportedly detached.A visual evaluation of the returned device found damage on the top and bottom part of the mouth piece where the device would interact with the patient's teeth.One of the outward facing sides was split through and on the same side of the device the distal tip was broken.No other issues were noted.Based on the evaluation of the returned device, it is most likely that operational factors lead to the user experiencing difficulty while using the device which could have led to the application of excessive pressure on the device, resulting in the scratches, break and split.Therefore, the most probable cause of the reported event is adverse event related to procedure, which indicates that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A manufacturing batch record review was unable to be performed as the lot number is unknown.However, a ship history review was performed to identify the most probable lots, and a dhr history review on the most probable lots did not identify any deviations within manufacturing/service processes that could have contributed to the event.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a blox bite block was used on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, after placing the bite block on the patient's mouth after sedation, a snapping sound was heard.The device was found broken and a fragment fell into the stomach.The broken fragment was removed from the patient's stomach using forceps.Another bite block was used to complete the procedure.There was no serious injury nor adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.
|