This supplemental medwatch report is reporting the evaluation of the device.This supplemental medwatch report is also correcting information submitted on the initial medwatch report.Evaluation results: the device was returned to zoll medical (b)(4)'s service department.The reported malfunction of "unable to discharge" and "arching" was not replicated or confirmed.The device and multi-function cable passed bench handling, defib and impedance testing without duplicating the reported malfunction.The customer did report that the user successfully shocked twice and was unable to discharge on the third attempt.After power cycling the device, the device discharged but the user reported the arcing.Review of the device activity logs showed the first successful shock with an impedance of 155 ohms and the second shock recorded 186 ohms.During the third charge cycle, the device prompted a "charge lead fault" and pads off message.By the time the device finished charging the device records a pads on.The device showed this impedance at 258 ohms, however there was no indication that a discharge was attempted.The device power was cycled and the device charged again.The device successfully discharges and reads an impedance of 275 ohms.Throughout the case, when the device registers pads on, the impedance fluctuates in time with cpr being performed.The impedance fluctuations and log review is consistent with poor contact between the electrode pads and the patient's skin.This can also contribute to arcing.However, the electrode pads used were not returned as part of this investigation and this cannot be firmly established.Analysis of reports of this type has not identified an increase in trend.
|