• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A. DEKA MOTUS AY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A. DEKA MOTUS AY Back to Search Results
Model Number M115A1
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Necrosis (1971); Scar Tissue (2060)
Event Date 01/28/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual device involved in the event has been evaluated by authorized local service.The device was found correctly working within the specifications ((b)(4) service report performed in date may the 22nd, 2019).All the relevant data gathered during the investigation have been evaluated by of our product manager for the dermatologic area, (which is also a person qualified to perform a medical judgement as per 21 cfr part 803.20(c)(2)) with the following outcome: the event has been caused by the use of too much aggressive parameters related to the patient's condition.In fact the product manager evaluated the vascular lesions of the patient as a large blue veins and not red teleangiectasia (spider veins).This error is supported by the fact that the physician have used the parameters that are reported in the motus ay's clinical manual code 055-0182-20-021 rev 1.0, at chapter §3.3.6.1 "standard laser handpieces protocol" for vascular lesions.Based on that is possible to conclude that the physician have used the wrong settings relative to the patient's condition.Moreover, based on the pictures available of the patient, the area was highly vascularized (high density of veins in the area) which have caused a very intense laser absorption.The evaluation of our product manager also stated that the patient was in a condition at the limit for laser treatment and more suitable for sclerotherapy (very large veins).The investigation carried out did not conclude that a design deficiency or device malfunction was responsible for causing the event.Rather, it is possible to conclude, based on the above mentioned investigation, that there was a human factors issue, where a failure of the operator to appropriately set the device's parameters related to the intended treatment and patient's condition, contributed to the event.By manufacturer's investigation the operator's manual and risk analysis are adequate.Device working within specifications.No remedial action required.This initial report is to be considered as final report, unless fda has further questions.
 
Event Description
In date may the 14th 2019, the (b)(4) distributor, (b)(4), sent a communication to el.En., relative to an adverse event in which the patient developed severe side effect, necrosis and scaring, on thigh and back of the knee following a vascular treatment with the motus ay nd:yag, ref m115a1, s/n (b)(4).The motus ay laser medical device is marketed in the us with 510(k) number k181486.The communication was supported with images of the treated area.The site ("(b)(6)) provided the following additional information: the physician treated the patient, of which no details have been reported beyond the skin type that is type-ii (fitzpatrick scale), in the left leg, thigh and back of the knee, for spider veins with motus ay laser medical device.Before the treatment the skin test was performed and during the treatment the zimmer cooler was used.In order to treat the injuries, the patient received the following medications: fucicort cream, bepanthen plus cream, ialugen plus cream, dermatix gel.Currently, the skin in the treated area is still very damaged presenting visible red scars due to skin necrosis the physician stated to have used the following parameters for the treatment: pulse duration: 1st pulse 5 ms, 2nd pulse 15 ms; spot size: 5mm; fluence: 105-110 j/cm2; frequency: 0.3hz.We, the manufacturer of device, became aware of the event on may 14th, 2019 by email from the (b)(4) distributor and, according to 21 cfr part 803 evaluated the event reportable because the patient received medical attention following the laser procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DEKA MOTUS AY
Type of Device
DEKA MOTUS AY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A.
via baldanzese 17
calenzano, 50041
IT  50041
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A.
via baldanzese 17
calenzano, 50041
IT   50041
Manufacturer Contact
andrea checchi
via baldanzese 17
calenzano, 50041
IT   50041
MDR Report Key8686183
MDR Text Key147596370
Report Number3001431138-2019-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K181486
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/11/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM115A1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/14/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/26/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-