The associated complaint device was returned and evaluated.A lab analysis was conducted and discoloration, likely due to absorption of biological fluid, was observed on the backside of the liner.Damage/deformation was observed on the overhang of the liner; this may have been caused by impingement with the neck of the stem.Total linear penetration was estimated to be 4.52mm using silicone mold replication.No unusual wear features were observed on the acetabular liner.There have been reports of similar amounts of linear penetration for virgin, conventional uhmwpe liners in service beyond ten years.While the device was manufactured in 2006 (a portion of the lot number was visible), years of service could not be determined as the implantation date was not reported.No evidence of material or manufacturing deviations was observed in this investigation.A clinical evaluation was conducted and although wear was reportedly the cause of the revision, without the implantation date and analysis of the explanted component the definitive root cause of the reported ¿excess wear¿ cannot be determined.The x-rays show eccentric wear supporting the complaint.The patient impact beyond the reported insert exchange/revision cannot be determined.Should additional clinical information become available the clinical/medical investigation may be re-evaluated.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.
|