The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.The lot number was not provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records could not be completed.
|
Our product evaluation laboratory received one model 831f75 swan-ganz catheter with a detached non-edwards introducer and a non-edwards contamination shield.As received, all through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.Also, no fault messages showed up on the lab vigilance ii monitor when the catheter was connected.The thermistor read 37.0°c when submerged into a 37.0°c water bath.The thermistor temperature reading was within specified accuracy, per the vigilance manual.The balloon inflated clear and concentric, and remained inflated for more than 5 timed minutes without leakage.No visible damage was observed from the catheter body.The customer report of fluid "down the blue lumen was coming backwards up the yellow lumen" was not confirmed on evaluation, as the device responded appropriately during functional testing.There was no evidence of a manufacturing nonconformance.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.High pressure alarms on the iv pump can be indicative of an occlusion in the line.In this case, the fluid was backing up into different lumens in the catheter with high pressure alarms and the user stated that medication was not being delivered consistently.High pressure alarms should alert the user to an issue with the system and troubleshooting should be started.Medication not being delivered consistently could cause a deterioration in the patient¿s condition and may necessitate additional interventions.It is unknown whether user or procedural factors contributed to the stated event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|